A woman has given birth to a giant baby weighing 16lb and measuring 2ft tall in Brazil. Angerson Santos was welcomed into the world via C-section at Hospital Padre Colombo in Parintins, Amazonas State, on Wednesday, January 18. Medics believe that the supersize baby is the biggest to have ever been born in the state, beating the previous record of 13lb and 1.8ft.
Cleidiane Santos dos Santos had visited the hospital for a routine obstetric consultation, reports the Mirror.
But doctors quickly realised that the unborn baby would be too big for her to carry to full term so kept her in for a C-section.
Surgeons carried out the C-section the next day and Angerson was born weighing 7.328 kilogrammes and measuring 59 centimetres.
The baby is in an incubator but is in stable condition and has no abnormalities, according to medics at the hospital.
Angerson is so large that none of the newborn clothes his parents had purchased prior to his arrival fit so a fundraiser has been launched to help the family buy new clothes.
The facility is taking donations of extra-large nappies and clothes for babies aged between nine months and a year.
Angerson smashes the previous Amazonas state record set by Pedro Aluizio, who was born in Parintins in 2014 weighing 6.74 kilogrammes (14lb 8oz) and measuring 57 centimetres.
Before that, the record was held by a baby born in the municipality in 2011 weighing 6.12 (13lb) kilogrammes and measuring 56 centimetres (1.8ft).
But according to the Guinness World Records, the heaviest baby ever was a boy born to Sig. Carmelina Fedele, weighing 10.2 kilogrammes (22lb 8oz) in Aversa, Italy, in September 1955.
*This story has not been edited by The Infallible staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.
Europe could soon develop its own alternative to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite constellation, as the continent scrambles to build its own spaceports, Express.co.uk was told. Last week, the European Union unveiled its first satellite launch complex in Arctic Sweden, marking its entry into a new space race. In a statement, European Space Agency (ESA) officials admitted that the continent is lagging behind and a launch site like this could help them catch up. Meanwhile, the UK, which is a part of the ESA, opened its own spaceport in Cornwall earlier this year, allowing companies to launch rockets carrying satellites from UK soil.
Speaking to Express.co.uk, aerospace expert and senior member of the IEEE Paul Kostek noted that a number of different “space races” have already begun.
He said: “Call it the old school government against government- the US against Chinese, then the Russians and the Europeans. You have the government space races of who’s going to get back to the Moon first or to Mars.
“Then you have the commercial space race, you have SpaceX, Virgin, Blue Origin rocket, and more and more companies are launching commercial products into space. You have the commercial side saying ‘look we’ve launched 12,000 satellites, we’ve got different satellite constellations that are being put up.'”
He added that he has tremendous business opportunities that could arise from developing its spaceports, saying: “If you look at the UK as an example, there’s lots of demand to put up satellites and other things.
“And of course, the challenge is whether you really want to send your satellite halfway around the world to launch from Arianespace, or do you want to send it to the US, or is there a way to viably start launching from the UK.”
Through the new launch site in Sweden, the EU is looking to develop its own launch capabilities, in the hopes of repeating its success in launching the Galileo navigational system in 2016.
The EU’s £8billion satellite constellation provides position, navigation and timing (PNT) services and is intended to rival the popular Global Positioning System (GPS), which is owned by the US Government.
Russia‘s invasion of Ukraine has sent countries around the world scrambling to strengthen their satellite communication technology, as the war showcased the vital role that high-speed internet has played in defence.
Given the success of the Galileo project, the ESA could soon consider developing and launching their own satellite constellation, using its own launch site.
When asked whether Europe could consider such a project, Mr Kostek said: “I would expect that there’s at least three different satellite constellations going up right now between SpaceX, Amazon has one planned, and the Chinese have one planned.
“I would expect that the European would want to do that.
“I think one of the big areas is that a lot of countries want to launch satellites in the Earth observation aspect. You really want to be able to focus in on your own country or regional issues, and it’s much easier to put those kinds of satellites up.”
Starlink satellites have been critical in helping the Ukrainian military over the past year, providing vital internet and communications lifeline, and even helping the military fly drones and attack Russian forces.
However, fears grew late last year that SpaceX CEO Elon Musk could potentially cut off access to Starlink for Ukrainian troops over funding issues, which could further push Europe towards boosting its independence in space.
Mr Kostek continued: “Another aspect that people are asking about is power being downloaded to the Earth through giant solar arrays in space collecting power.
“It’s been around as a concept for years and NASA just launched a test satellite to see how viable it is to download power, you have that aspect coming along too. I fully that at some point people will be trying to launch space constellation of power generating satellites.”
*This story has not been edited by The Infallible staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.
A new mum was left frustrated after her family disapproved of her daughter’s name and even mistook it for a car manufacturer. Bella Davis, 18, was forced to justify the name she gave to her baby to relatives after her birth. Bella and her boyfriend, Reason Robison, 20, fell in love with the name Polaris – another name for the North Star – before their baby girl was born last July.
But despite the couple loving it, relatives had their doubts. Stay-at-home mum Bella said: “When we told our friends and family almost everyone didn’t like it.
“A lot of people thought of the car manufacturing company, Polaris Inc, which sells all-terrain vehicles.
“My sister absolutely hated it but once Polaris was born, she started to like it a bit more. A lot of people have warmed to it since, my mum said she liked it, but I don’t know if she was lying to me.
“I’ve had a lot of people online who don’t like it as well.”
After sharing her little girl’s name on TikTok, Bella received a lot of backlash with trolls claiming the moniker “sounds like a disease”.
“A lot of the comments are saying she’d be bullied in school for her name and that it’s ugly,” Bella said.
“I’ve just stopped reading the comments now because they’re too hateful. I don’t really care but it’s also not very nice to hear at the same time.”
The name had a personal meaning to the young couple, as they first bonded over a love of astronomy and would go stargazing together on their dates.
Bella recalled how Reason had pointed to the North Star, or Polaris, just before asking her to be his girlfriend.
Despite the backlash, Bella and Reason claim they don’t regret naming their daughter Polaris – pronounced as ‘Pol-air-is’ – and encourage parents to “go for it” if they like an unusual name.
Bella said: “I’ve never once regretted naming her Polaris. To all the people online, I’d say it’s not your kid and you shouldn’t give your opinion unless it’s wanted because the things people say do hurt and it’s unnecessary.
“I’d definitely say to other parents that if you love a name then go for it.”
This story has not been edited by The Infallible staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.
The United States has expressed doubts about whether Kyiv has the ability to drive out Russian troops from its territory this year.
Speculation has been mounting that Ukraine will launch a massive spring offensive to reclaim occupied territory seized by Moscow.
However those hopes appeared to be dealt a major blow on Friday, after Western leaders refused to commit to provide Ukraine‘s army with much needed tanks.
At a security meeting held in Germany to discuss the Ukraine war, US General Mark Milley said it would be “very, very difficult” to eject Putin”s army from “every inch of Russian-occupied Ukraine.”
His comments come as Ukraine‘s military confirmed its forces had wiped out a Wagner ammunition dump and headquarters in Soledar, in the hotly contested Donbas.
He 45th Separate Artillery Brigade released a video showing the strike and its aftermath.
A spokesperson for Ukraine‘s military said: “The headquarters and field warehouse of the Wagner mercenaries in Soledar were destroyed.”
This story has not been edited by The Infallible staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may have taken a financial hit upon moving to the US and leaving their royal lives behind them – but the Duke has reportedly scored £16million for his book, Spare. This adds to the £109million the Sussexes have already made in media deals with both Spotify and Netflix.
However, their luxurious home in Montecito and the necessity for expensive security means it’s not clear that the lucrative deals will have left them stress-free when it comes to finances. Let’s take a look at just how Harry and Meghan have funded their lifestyle since leaving the royal family in 2020 – and the pair’s biggest expenses.
Books
The most recent media output from the Sussexes and likely the most controversial since Megxit is Prince Harry’s memoir, Spare. According to Forbes, Spare is just the first in a reported four-book deal with Penguin Random House which netted the couple £16million.
A massive 750,000 copies of Spare have been sold since its publication on January 10, leading the publisher to claim it is the fastest-selling non-fiction book ever.
Harry reportedly paid his ghostwriter, JJ Moehringer, $1million for the book, which includes details of an alleged fight with William, in which the Prince claims William physically assaulted him, as well multiple rows between Meghan and Kate. The Prince has also given £1.2million of its proceeds to charity.
It is not known what future books by the Sussexes will be about – although Prince Harry has told the Telegraph that Spare included just half of what he has to say, with the couple already accused of “blackmailing” the royal family with the potential contents of future biographies.
But Spare is not the only book the Sussexes have put out, with Meghan bringing in a $700,000 advance for the children’s book “The Bench”, which was released in June 2021 to widespread sales but middling reviews.
Spotify
Harry and Meghan secured a reported £18million deal with Spotify in 2020, although production has reportedly hit several snags. In January 2022, the Sun claimed Spotify had taken the project “into its own hands” due to a lack of content being produced by the Sussexes.
A “full-scale” launch of shows had been promised in 2021 – but this seemed not to materialise, with reports from unnamed Spotify sources claiming that in-house staff was being brought into the project to make sure it stuck the landing. In 2022, Meghan’s podcast was finally released, titled Archetypes and exploring sexist labels and stereotypes surrounding women.
It is not known if it will return for a second series. Harry is scarcely present throughout Archetypes, although the pair also produced a 35-minute “holiday special” together in December 2020, featuring celebrity friends such as Elton John and James Corden.
According to various reports, the Sussexes made £88million for their Netflix deal which includes their six-part docuseries, which was released in December last year and has just reached the title of the streaming giant’s second most successful documentary.
They had already released an earlier docuseries titled Live to Lead, which featured interviews with world leaders and celebrities including Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Gloria Steinem.
An animated kids show, named Pearl, was announced but then scrapped in May before release, but Heart of Invictus, a docuseries following a group of injured service members preparing for the Invictus Games, is slated for release later this year.
While the pair have doubtlessly taken a lot to the bank with their various media deals, their outgoing funds are also substantial. In 2020, the couple splurged on a $14.7million home in the secluded seaside town of Montecito, California, seeing them share a neighbourhood with the likes of Oprah Winfrey, Ellen DeGeneres and Ariana Grande.
They took out a $10million mortgage for the home, but it’s unclear based on available records whether the loan has been paid off. Meanwhile, according to Forbes in 2021, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s annual security bill could easily reach $2 to $3million for around-the-clock protection.
This may seem liked a lot, but it’s necessary – the Metropolitan Police’s former head of counterterrorism Neil Basu revealed in November that Meghan was the target of “disgusting and very real” threats from the far right.
He told Channel 4: “If you’d seen the stuff that was written and you were receiving it . . . you would feel under threat all of the time.”
A bodyguard who famously worked for Princess Diana believes “something is not quite right” with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s relationship, as he raised concerns over Harry’s happiness following the release of his new bombshell book.
Ken Wharfe, who worked as the late Princess of Wales’ personal protection officer between 1988 and 1993, was asked by GB News’ Mark Dolan if he believes Meghan Markle has brainwashed Prince Harry.
Mr Wharf responded: “Well I think that when you look at the wedding and the public events that followed – an event in Nottingham and that event in London – she [Meghan] is the consummate actress, the consummate performer.
“You could see the look in Harry’s eyes saying ‘hey look what I’ve got, it’s amazing’, but where did it all fall apart?”
The discovery of classified files in President Biden’s possession is very different from Donald Trump’s case. In Trump’s case, the president was accused of improperly handling classified information by sharing it with individuals who were not authorized to access it.
In Biden’s case, he was found to have inadvertently taken possession of the files during his transition period, and has since turned them over to the appropriate authorities. Biden has not been accused of any wrongdoing in this matter.
What is Donald Trump’s classified files case?
Donald Trump’s classified files case is a case that was filed in 2019, alleging that the President of the United States violated the Constitution by not disclosing his financial ties with foreign governments and entities. The plaintiffs in the case are seeking access to President Trump’s financial records, which are currently protected by executive privilege. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
The president denied the allegations, claiming that he did not share any classified information. The FBI then conducted an investigation into the matter, but ultimately found insufficient evidence to bring any charges against the president.
Donald Trump’s classified files case has been ongoing since 2017, when the Department of Justice released a report that found that the FBI had sufficient evidence to investigate whether Trump and his campaign had colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Since then, the case has seen multiple developments.
In May 2018, special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to investigate the matter. He conducted an exhaustive two-year investigation, which resulted in the indictments of multiple individuals, including Trump’s former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, and Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen.
In April 2019, Mueller’s report was released to the public, and it concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to establish that Trump had conspired or coordinated with Russia to influence the election. However, it did not exonerate him on obstruction of justice.
Since then, the case has largely been in the hands of Attorney General William Barr, who has been tasked with reviewing the evidence and determining whether additional legal action should be taken. In July 2020, the Justice Department announced that it would not pursue additional charges against Trump.
In January 2021, the Justice Department released a memo outlining its decision to close the investigation and not pursue any further legal action. The memo noted that the evidence did not establish that Trump was guilty of any criminal conduct. The decision has been widely criticized by Democrats and other opponents of the president.
President Biden’s possession of the files during his transition period
President Biden’s possession of the investigation of the file is a positive step forward in ensuring that the truth is uncovered and justice is served. The Biden administration has a strong commitment to transparency and accountability, and this investigation will help to ensure that the proper steps are being taken to protect the American people and to hold those responsible for any wrongdoing accountable.
In Biden’s case, he was found to have inadvertently taken possession of the files during his transition period. The transition process requires incoming administrations to review prior administration documents. Biden’s staff believed the files were in the transition process and were not aware that they had been illegally obtained. Once the mistake was discovered, the files were returned to their rightful owner.
Biden’s direction will help to ensure that the public receives a full accounting of the facts and that any potential wrongdoings are fully investigated.
A batch of classified documents discovered during the vice president’s tenure has been addressed by the attorney general, Merrick Garland. Garland has expressed his commitment to transparency, and has promised to take the necessary steps to ensure that the public has access to all of the materials in question. He has also promised to pursue any criminal wrongdoing that may have occurred in connection with the documents. Garland is also working to ensure that all relevant agencies are taking proper steps to protect and preserve the documents.
Rahul Gandhi should apologize for Operation Blue Star because it was a military operation that had devastating consequences for the Sikh community.
The operation resulted in the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians and the destruction of the Golden Temple. The operation was condemned by many for its excessive use of force, and an apology from Rahul Gandhi is a sign of respect and understanding for the suffering of the Sikh community.
Indian Army’s use of force against innocent civilians, and the damage caused to innocent lives and the Sikh community, were unjustified and deeply unfortunate.
The operation caused long-term harm to the Sikh community, and the apology would be an important step in healing the wounds of the past. It would also demonstrate that the government and its leadership are willing to accept responsibility for their actions and recognize the suffering of those affected.
What is Operation Blue Star?
Operation Blue Star was the Indian Army’s 1984 military operation against Sikh separatists in the Golden Temple at Amritsar. The operation was ordered by the then Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi.
The operation was conducted by the Indian Army, paramilitary forces, and police forces, and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people, including Sikh separatists and civilians.
Why it is important to conduct Operation Blue Star?
Operation Blue Star was a military operation conducted by the Indian Army in June 1984 to remove militant religious leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his followers from the Harmandir Sahib complex (also known as the Golden Temple) in Amritsar, Punjab.
The operation was conducted in order to restore law and order in Punjab, which had been destabilized by the activities of Bhindranwale and his followers. The operation was important because it was necessary to restore order to the region, and to prevent Bhindranwale and his followers from continuing their activities, which were seen as a threat to the unity and security of India.
Who is religious leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale?
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was a Sikh religious leader and militant who became a major figure in the Khalistan movement in the 1980s. He was known for his fiery and confrontational rhetoric and was seen by many as the chief proponent of the movement for an independent Sikh state in India. He was killed in 1984 during Operation Blue Star, a military operation by the Indian Armed Forces to flush out militants from the Golden Temple in Amritsar.
What is the Khalistan movement?
The Khalistan movement is a Sikh separatist movement that seeks to create an independent Sikh nation in the Punjab region of India. The movement began in the 1970s and has been led by several groups and individuals over the years.
Its aims have varied over time, with some calling for a peaceful and negotiated solution to the issue and others advocating for an armed struggle against the Indian government.
The movement has been dormant since the 1990s, but there have been sporadic acts of violence associated with the Khalistan movement in recent years.
Who are the associates of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale?
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was associated with the Damdami Taksal, a Sikh religious movement in Punjab, India. He was also associated with other Sikh groups such as the All India Sikh Student Federation and the Sikh Students Federation. He also had close ties to Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Bhindranwale, the leader of the Damdami Taksal.
Was Operation Blue Star the wrong decision by prime minister Indra Gandhi?
The answer to this question is subjective and depends on one’s opinion. It is generally accepted that Operation Blue Star was a controversial decision by Prime Minister Indra Gandhi.
The operation led to the deaths of hundreds of people, including innocent civilians, and the destruction of significant cultural sites. Many consider it to have been an excessive and unwarranted use of force.
Others point to the fact that the operation was necessary to quell a militant separatist movement operating in the region. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide whether Operation Blue Star was the right or wrong decision.
Technology can be used to frame a person by using evidence such as video footage, surveillance photos, and audio recordings to manipulate the truth and make it appear as if the person has done something they haven’t. For example, a person could be framed by editing a video to make it look like they said or did something they didn’t actually do. Technology can be used to frame someone by using facial recognition technology to falsely match a person to a crime scene.
It is possible for a government to frame a person through technology by manipulating data or evidence, planting false evidence, or hacking into their computer or phone.
There are several instances in which data can be misused by the government, including using it for political gain, collecting too much data, and sharing it without permission with third parties.
An inaccurate conclusion can be drawn if data are manipulated to support a political agenda. False claims and exaggerations are made based on cherry-picked evidence, ignoring or misrepresenting facts, and misrepresenting or ignoring facts.
Misuse of statistics can also involve using outdated or misleading data, manipulating survey questions to obtain the desired results, and making assumptions without evidence.
Data can be used to identify individuals with certain characteristics that are then used to restrict access to services or resources. This could be done by analyzing data on a person’s race, gender, class, or other demographic attributes. In order to disproportionately impact certain groups of people, voting laws or other regulations can be manipulated using data.
Some apps may have removed their content moderation processes, allowing hate content to be posted. If the app allows users to post content of their own, hate content can be posted by users. You are most likely experiencing this problem because the app you are using is using algorithms to deliver content it believes you will engage with, which may include offensive or hateful material.
Hate content can be damaging to individuals, communities and society as a whole. Hate speech can lead to discrimination and violence, and can be used to spread dangerous and false information.
Governments can use their power to control the economy, create laws that favour certain groups, or institutions, use tax money for activities that benefit their interests, and limit the rights of citizens. They may also use propaganda to manipulate public opinion, restrict access to information, or use surveillance to control citizens.
Imposing taxes on citizens, limiting civil liberties, limiting access to education and basic services, and passing laws that disproportionately affect certain groups of people. Governments can also exploit people by taking advantage of their economic or social vulnerability.
The government use religious organizations to further its political agenda or to further the interests of one particular religion. Government officials could use their positions of authority to influence religious organizations or impose their own beliefs on the members of those organizations.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has a set of laws that are intended to ensure that all women adhere to a particular dress code. Women who are found to be not in compliance with the law can be arrested, fined, and even imprisoned. In some cases, women have been reported to have been raped in order to make them comply with the modesty laws.
This is in addition to the other forms of punishment that can be imposed. The Islamic Republic of Iran is one of the few countries in the world to use rape as a form of punishment, and it is widely condemned by international rights groups.
Rape is a serious crime in Iran and is punishable by law. However, the enforcement of women’s modesty through the threat of rape has been widely reported in the country.
The Iranian government has been accused of using rape as a way to punish and control women who fail to adhere to its strict dress code and other moral codes. Reports of these cases have been documented by international human rights organizations, such as Human Rights Watch.
In some cases, women have been raped as punishment for engaging in activities deemed as “immoral” or “un-Islamic” by the government. This has been used as a way to discourage women from engaging in activities that are not approved by the authorities.
What are Iran’s modesty laws?
Iran has some of the most restrictive laws on clothing in the world. These laws, known as modesty laws, require that both men and women abide by certain standards of dress. Women must cover their hair and wear loose-fitting clothing that covers the arms and legs, while men must cover their arms and legs and avoid wearing tight-fitting clothing. These laws are enforced by the country’s morality police, and those who are found to be in violation of the modesty laws face fines, imprisonment, and even lashes.
Role of Iran’s morality police
The role of the Iranian morality police is to enforce Islamic laws that are based on Sharia law. The morality police are responsible for ensuring that citizens abide by the strict dress code, gender segregation, and bans on alcohol and other activities seen as immoral. They also patrol public spaces, including parks, to ensure that people are not engaging in activities that violate Islamic laws. They may also monitor internet use, especially social media, to detect violations of Islamic religious and moral codes. The morality police have the authority to issue fines and other punishments for violations of Islamic law.
Vida Movahed
Iran anti-hijab protest
The anti-hijab protest in Iran began on December 28, 2017, when a woman, later identified as Vida Movahed, removed her hijab in a public place in Tehran and waved it on a stick in protest. The move sparked a wave of similar protests throughout the country as women came out in droves to express their opposition to the mandatory hijab. In the weeks that followed, hundreds of women staged protests in cities throughout the country, often with police officers watching closely. In response to the protests, the government arrested dozens of women and issued warnings to others. The protests continued throughout 2018 and 2019, with women taking to the streets in cities such as Tehran, Isfahan, and Shiraz. In 2019, the Iranian government began to make concessions, allowing women to wear hijabs in colours other than black and loosening other restrictions on women’s dress.
Mahsa Amini’s death
Mahsa Amini
Mahsa Amini, a young Iranian rights activist, was found dead in her cell in the notorious Qarchak prison in Iran in late August 2020. It is believed that she died after suffering physical and psychological abuse while in custody.
Her death has been met with an outcry from international human rights organizations, which have condemned the Iranian government for its mistreatment of prisoners and violation of human rights.
The Iranian government has denied any responsibility for her death, claiming that she committed suicide. However, her family and human rights groups have disputed this claim, citing the fact that she had no history of mental illness and had been in good spirits prior to her death.
The Iranian government arrested a prominent actor on Saturday for supporting the three-month-old protest movement sparked by the death of a detainee, Iranian media reported.
Tasnim reported that Taraneh Alidoosti, 38, had been detained for “publishing false and distorted content and stirring up chaos.” The actress is best known for her role in the Oscar-winning 2016 film “The Salesman”.
